|
|
 今天心血来潮，买了便便的一台香港VPS，他家是用XenServer架构和XenSystem管理平台，大家都知道的
CPU核心: Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 2核心
物理内存: Kingston 512MB RECC DDR3
物理硬盘: Seagate 20GB SAS
国际带宽: 2Mbps on 100Mbps Switch
每月流量: 1000GB
IP地址: 1个IPv4地
原价：98元/月，使用优惠码：October，是73.5元/月
9new.jpg
(27.17 KB, 下载次数: 0)
9new2.jpg
(117.62 KB, 下载次数: 0)
Ping值：不错，香港免北岸，速度也好，不过这口太小了点
9new3.jpg
(145.65 KB, 下载次数: 0)
硬盘：由于便便说不要D，但还是忍不住D了下30M/s，忘记截图了，不在折腾了
9new6.jpg
(51.26 KB, 下载次数: 0)
内存：未装任何环境前，用了42M
9new5.jpg
(21.93 KB, 下载次数: 0)
CPU：E5的CPU，很给力
9new7.jpg
(68.01 KB, 下载次数: 0)
下载美国Webnx资源：
9new8.jpg
(17.25 KB, 下载次数: 0)
探针：安装完LNMP后，重启VPS
9new9.jpg
(163.6 KB, 下载次数: 0)
CPU跑分：
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: MyVPS967: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 23:41:32 EDT 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (5017.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (5017.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
17:36:42 up 10 min, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.09, 0.07; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 22 2012 17:36:42 - 18:04:43
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 11136247.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1870.5 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1048.4 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 307578.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 85294.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 868015.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 471532.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 80133.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3402.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3152.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 742.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 383766.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 11136247.9 954.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1870.5 340.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 1048.4 243.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 307578.6 776.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 85294.0 515.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 868015.2 1496.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 471532.8 379.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 80133.0 200.3
Process Creation 126.0 3402.4 270.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3152.6 743.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 742.1 1236.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 383766.1 255.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 497.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 22 2012 18:04:43 - 18:32:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21484592.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3768.5 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3286.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 167684.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 46720.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 404583.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 935077.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 162644.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5786.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5419.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 801.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 726019.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21484592.7 1841.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3768.5 685.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 3286.6 764.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 167684.7 423.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 46720.3 282.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 404583.4 697.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 935077.2 751.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 162644.5 406.6
Process Creation 126.0 5786.3 459.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5419.4 1278.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 801.6 1335.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 726019.2 484.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 677.3
======= Script description and score comparison: =======
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2012-10-23 09:49:47
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
收藏
——来自呶呶防御鸡 
楼主
