全球主机交流论坛

标题: 选来选去，还是买了Photonvps [打印本页]

作者: sense520 时间: 2010-8-12 02:20
标题: 选来选去，还是买了Photonvps
机器倒是很强悍
入的BEAM 1
技术支持响应还挺快，待长期观察

# #  # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #
# #  ## #  # #  #          # #  #    ## #  # #  # #
# #  # #  #  # ##          ##### ##### # #  #  #    ######
# #  #  # #  # ##          # #  #    #  # #  #    # #
# #  # ##  # #  #          # #  #    # ##  # #  # #
#### # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #

Version 5.1.2                   Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                    Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Process Creation  1 2 3

8 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: www.ma-dou.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5.028stab067.4 -- #1 SMP Thu Jan 14 21:23:12 MSK 2010
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.1 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.3 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.4 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.2 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.4 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.3 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.3 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.4 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
00:40:38 up  1:15,  1 user,  load average: 0.19, 0.24, 0.22; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 2010 00:40:38 - 01:24:10
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       8631250.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   1941.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            3416.8 lps (29.4 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       405050.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       123108.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1030629.1 KBps  (30.4 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            828552.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                57608.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            9954.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                4064.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1405.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      737618.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 8631250.5 739.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    1941.8 353.1
Execl Throughput                               43.0    3416.8 794.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    405050.2 1022.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    123108.3 743.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1030629.1 1776.9
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0    828552.3 666.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    57608.8 144.0
Process Creation                               126.0    9954.2 790.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    4064.1 958.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1405.2 2341.9
System Call Overhead                         15000.0    737618.8 491.7
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        731.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 2010 01:24:10 - 02:16:31
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    32109619.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   14047.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            14106.2 lps (29.3 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       943173.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       262050.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    1945315.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            3206064.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                925155.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            35382.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                12202.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                2018.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      3130429.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 32109619.8 2751.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    14047.8 2554.2
Execl Throughput                               43.0    14106.2 3280.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    943173.6 2381.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    262050.1 1583.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0 1945315.4 3354.0
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 3206064.1 2577.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    925155.4 2312.9
Process Creation                               126.0    35382.1 2808.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    12202.9 2878.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    2018.6 3364.3
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 3130429.7 2087.0
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                     2607.2

======= Script description and score comparison: =======

http://www.ctohome.com/FuWuQi/c5/172.html

[ 本帖最后由 sense520 于 2010-8-12 02:29 编辑 ]

作者: 2521298 时间: 2010-8-12 04:14
线路最近很不错的

作者: coolart 时间: 2010-8-14 12:17
观察一下

作者: lxfy 时间: 2010-8-14 12:27
最近线路似乎又有细微提速不错

作者: PhotonVPS-Jasmi 时间: 2010-8-16 22:56

原帖由 sense520 于 2010-8-12 02:20 发表
机器倒是很强悍
入的BEAM 1
技术支持响应还挺快，待长期观察

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # ...

看起來OK 不錯

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://sunk.eu.org/)