全球主机交流论坛
标题:
又一次耗电的折腾 自家电脑上VM的UB+dd跑分
[打印本页]
作者:
用户名
时间:
2012-9-1 14:54
标题:
又一次耗电的折腾 自家电脑上VM的UB+dd跑分
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: debian: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:01:19 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6412.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6412.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6412.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6412.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
13:55:23 up 11 min, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 01 2012 13:55:23 - 14:24:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21306625.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3350.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3392.1 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 708619.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 183129.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2006268.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1213710.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 331491.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9328.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8161.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3064.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3766030.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21306625.9 1825.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3350.2 609.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 3392.1 788.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 708619.8 1789.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 183129.3 1106.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2006268.0 3459.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1213710.5 975.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 331491.9 828.7
Process Creation 126.0 9328.7 740.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8161.0 1924.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3064.1 5106.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3766030.8 2510.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1453.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 01 2012 14:24:01 - 14:52:47
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 72840854.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12469.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 18013.9 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 730919.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 196527.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2487292.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4161141.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1164904.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 57414.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 25981.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3322.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 9932789.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 72840854.6 6241.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12469.9 2267.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 18013.9 4189.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 730919.8 1845.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 196527.1 1187.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2487292.4 4288.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4161141.2 3345.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1164904.1 2912.3
Process Creation 126.0 57414.5 4556.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 25981.6 6127.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3322.4 5537.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 9932789.9 6621.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3648.2
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 13.7027 s, 19.6 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.38476 s, 49.9 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.40979 s, 49.6 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.10819 s, 52.6 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.66791 s, 57.5 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.80399 s, 55.9 MB/s
root@debian:/home/UnixBench#
debian 32bit
4 CPUs
1G RAM
真心不错啊
作者:
alttcn
时间:
2012-9-1 14:59
不错了。
作者:
用户名
时间:
2012-9-1 15:00
alttcn 发表于 2012-9-1 14:59
不错了。
要交多点电费
作者:
单手摘月
时间:
2012-9-1 15:00
提示:
作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者:
—。—
时间:
2012-9-1 15:01
浪费电...太阳能去
作者:
zt1993
时间:
2012-9-1 15:44
localhost
作者:
老白
时间:
2012-9-1 16:24
提示:
作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者:
imtu
时间:
2012-9-1 16:43
折腾啊
作者:
qxwo
时间:
2012-9-1 16:54
这也叫折腾?
欢迎光临 全球主机交流论坛 (https://sunk.eu.org/)
Powered by Discuz! X3.4