全球主机交流论坛

标题: 不解 [打印本页]

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-4-8 12:42
标题: 不解
昨天steadcom从openvz换成了XEN，cpu也变成8核了。探针 http://96.44.155.133/p.php 怎么安装DZ6 下面的执行速度还没有OPENVZ的低呢？OPENVZ的执行在0.00*，XEN的却在0.0*了。高手指点下、

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

8 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Process Creation  1 2 3

8 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: server1.: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 12:04:23 EDT 2010
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3460 @ 2.80GHz (7004.0 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
09:11:13 up 48 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.20, 0.30, 0.66; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 08 2010 09:11:13 - 09:39:25
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    15289566.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   3014.1 MWIPS (9.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               768.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       302640.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          78704.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       806978.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            387704.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                100551.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            4159.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                1956.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1086.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      446438.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 15289566.4 1310.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    3014.1 548.0
Execl Throughput                               43.0       768.7 178.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    302640.4 764.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    78704.0 475.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0    806978.9 1391.3
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0    387704.9 311.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    100551.0 251.4
Process Creation                               126.0    4159.9 330.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    1956.6 461.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1086.0 1810.1
System Call Overhead                         15000.0    446438.9 297.6
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        522.8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 08 2010 09:39:25 - 10:12:18
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    48731562.4 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   17289.4 MWIPS (14.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            3783.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       118318.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          32776.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       371702.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            2390914.2 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                582670.7 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            5758.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                9182.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                1186.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      3419331.5 lps (10.2 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 48731562.4 4175.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    17289.4 3143.5
Execl Throughput                               43.0    3783.7 879.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    118318.2 298.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    32776.4 198.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0    371702.9 640.9
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 2390914.2 1922.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    582670.7 1456.7
Process Creation                               126.0    5758.2 457.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    9182.3 2165.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    1186.9 1978.2
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 3419331.5 2279.6
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                     1152.2

作者: cpuer 时间: 2010-4-8 12:46
一定程度上说明了OpenVZ的执行效率会比XEN好些。

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-4-8 12:51
标题: 回复 2# 的帖子

也少太多了

作者: fish 时间: 2010-4-8 13:39
标题: 回复 3# 的帖子
xen下面装ea了吗？
一般不装ea都达不到0.00X

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-4-8 14:20
标题: 回复 4# 的帖子
装了。。

作者: daitangjun 时间: 2010-4-8 14:21
标题: 回复 5# 的帖子
已编译模块检测
date  libxml  openssl  pcre  zlib  bcmath  ctype  curl  dom  filter  ftp  gd
gettext  hash  iconv  json  mbstring  mcrypt  mhash  mime_magic  mysql  SimpleXML  pcntl  SPL
PDO  pdo_sqlite  posix  Reflection  session  shmop  mysqli  soap  sockets  SQLite  standard  sysvsem
tokenizer  xml  xmlreader  xmlrpc  xmlwriter  zip  cgi-fcgi  memcache  pdo_mysql  Zend Optimizer  eAccelerator

作者: wzwen 时间: 2010-4-8 14:30

原帖由 cpuer 于 2010-4-8 12:46 发表
一定程度上说明了OpenVZ的执行效率会比XEN好些。

可是xen价格贵

作者: hx 时间: 2010-4-8 16:25
openvz比xen效率高很多，这是显然是。
其实如果信得过商家的话，做网站openvz比xen好很多。

作者: gdtv 时间: 2010-4-8 16:27
标题: 回复 8# 的帖子
如果世界上还有“信得过”的东西的话，就不会有穷人了

作者: eben 时间: 2010-4-8 16:29
如果世界上还有“信得过”的东西的话，就不会有穷人了

作者: yjmade 时间: 2010-4-8 17:13
你太幸运了！8核2.8G阿

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://sunk.eu.org/)